Busting ERP Myths: The Top Five Myths About Using ERP on Your Shop Floor | SAP ERP Services in Singapore, Malaysia

0

 For increased efficiency, presence and, ultimately to save cash, lots of manufacturing companies are checking out software options to enhance production for their shop floors. But there is no simple solution to selecting the very best manufacturing software for a center.

The majority of manufacturing companies are contrasting two services: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software and Manufacturing Execution System (MES) software. In some facilities, IT groups are mandated to invest into ERP and to utilize ERP functions any place possible, including the shop flooring, typically without regard to practical fit.

The following are five common myths about using ERP on the shop floor:


Myth # 1: A single ERP solution offers lower Total Expense of Ownership (TCO).

The prospect of handling an organization with a single omnipotent application suite can be seductive, however in a lot of cases, it doesn't offer the depth of functionality needed to support the requirements of production. To compensate, IT departments have established extensive personalizations on top of ERP systems. This custom-made advancement is often made with specialized, costly ERP resources and develops an ongoing upkeep requirement. It is common for ERP executions to need five-to-seven times the expense of services - on top of the expense of the software licenses - and wind up costing far more to support and preserve than initially anticipated.

To decrease execution costs, top ERP vendors are allowing simpler integration and have actually welcomed the integration of third-party manufacturing applications through web services, XML integration requirements and partner programs. Yet, many IT departments are still trying to personalize on top of ERP systems.

Additionally, MES suppliers have actually purchased off the shelf integration user interfaces to ERP, leveraging market standards consisting of ISA95 and OAGIS XML.

When investigating solutions, remember that system integrators tend to stay with what has worked before and may advise custom choices, specifically considering that they remain in the business of composing interfaces and establishing custom-made performance. It is necessary that organizations' IT teams review MES-integration service plans in order to take advantage of the most recent XML and requirements based off the rack combination options.

Myth # 2: You get better visibility and a "single version of fact" from a centralized ERP system.

ERP systems usually do not offer enough performance to turn the shop floor entirely paperless. As long as there are numerous paper logs and spreadsheets on the shop floor, there is a chance that these different data sources will become different "truths" for different departments.

Lots of ERP suppliers have acquired third-party modules to broaden their production performance. There is frequently really little distinction between the integration of internal ERP modules and the combination attained with an MES supplier solution.

The very best method to make sure a "single reality" is to have a great combination strategy between ERP and MES that makes the shop floor genuinely paperless. Organizations can still support business decision making tools with consistent exposure into global operations through well incorporated ERP and MES applications.

 


 

Misconception # 3: Standardizing on the exact same ERP system across the corporation increases efficiency.

Many leading organizations have recognized that their ERP system can service some plants and operations simply fine, but other plants with different manufacturing models are much better serviced with a specialized, incorporated MES system. It is ending up being more typical for companies with diverse products and manufacturing models to standardize with 2 or even 3 solution sets, not simply one. The cost of supporting an additional MES system can be quickly warranted in these scenarios.

Synnove Systems provides quality SAP Consulting Services in the region with our regional offices in Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. Our award winning team bring innovation and differentiated capabilities that help Clients create value and deliver business outcomes. Synnove Systems is set to become a market leader in Enterprise Business Solutions. Synnove Systems – One of the competent ERP solutions company Malaysia‎, SAP accounting software Malaysia, payroll ERP software Malaysia.



Misconception # 4: A single ERP vendor will offer better continuous assistance.

Some stakeholders in companies might believe that dealing with a single vendor or a single system integrator offers much better outcomes and technical support. However, the reality is that companies serviced by smaller sized MES suppliers that specialize in specific markets get much better service and quicker action.

Myth # 5: The functionality in ERP is good enough for the discrete-production shop floor.

According to AMR Research's 2006 survey, the following concerns arose among companies utilizing and assessing ERP for their plants:.

These survey results on ERP systems are still legitimate today. To verify these impressions, organizations ought to research the amount of screens and commands required in the ERP system to perform a couple of common production deals, like a work order split. Then, compare the efforts required to perform the very same functions in an MES created for a particular industry. Also, it would be beneficial to compare the times required for a mechanic on the shop floor to carry out assessment data collection and signatures in both systems. These basic information points will provide a quick idea of the differences in ease of use and off-the-shelf alternatives in each application.

When looking into which software system would work best for your shop floor, analyze an ERP system's fit. The best solution might be an incorporated ERP-MES system.
  • ERP has an intricate interface for the manufacturing personnel.
  • ERP doesn't address all of our requirements and can't design our complicated manufacturing processes.
  • ERP takes too long and costs too much to tailor and implement for manufacturing.
  • ERP configuration needs specialized and pricey ERP software skills.
  • ERP screens require costly configuration for triggering and verifying information collection.
  •  



  • Post a Comment

     
    Top